|
Home > Issues
> Questions Regarding the LDS Church (Mormons)
Questions
Regarding
The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-Day Saints (Mormons)
by Daniel Newby,
May 26, 2005
Foreword: As primary sources, I attempt
to rely upon those accepted by the LDS church and its members,
and that can be found with relative ease. I have also tried to
keep opinion to a minimum. I do believe that
it is both healthy and essential to publicly challenge and rigorously
debate all religious philosophies, claims, and assertions.
If you do not concur with this belief, then you are probably
not ready to read this.
Topics:
PART I: Questions of Legitimacy
Regarding Scriptural Alterations
We will provide two of many examples of the
type of alterations found throughout LDS scriptural and
historical records. Following each passage, we will
attempt to ask one or more questions from the perspective of
someone seeking truth and consistency.
The first example is found in Doctrine and Covenants,
Section 10, which discusses Joseph Smith's loss of
many transcribed pages from the Book of Mormon. The words in bold strikethrough
were deleted from the original version of this account found
in the Book of Commandments published in 1833. The
words in red bold
underline were added to the 1835 Doctrine
and Covenants (a few minor changes were made in later
translations):
-
"NOW, behold I say unto you, that because you
have delivered up so many
those
writings, which you had power
given unto you
to translate by
the means of the Urim and Thummim, into the
hands of a wicked man, you have lost them,
. and you also lost your gift at the same time,
and your mind
became darkened. nevertheless it has
been is
now restored unto you again: therefore, see
that you are faithful and go
continue
on unto the finishing of the remainder of the work
of translation
as you have begun. Do not run faster
or labor more
than you have strength and means provided
to enable you
to translate, but be diligent unto the end.
Pray always, that you may come off conquerer;
yea, that you may conquer Satan, and those
that you may
escape the hands of the servants of Satan
that do uphold his work.
-
"Behold they have sought to destroy you; yea,
even the man in whom you have trusted,
has sought to
destroy you. and for this cause I said, that
he is a wicked man, for he has sought to take away the
things wherewith you have been intrusted
entrusted;
and he has also sought to destroy your gift, and because you
have delivered the writings into his hands, behold
they
wicked men have taken them from you:
therefore, you have delivered them up; yea, that which was
sacred unto wickedness. And behold, Satan has
hath
put it into their hearts to alter the words which you have
caused to be written, or which you have translated, which
have gone out of your hands; and behold I say unto you, that
because they have altered the words, they read contrary from
that which you translated and caused to be written; and on
this wise the devil has sought to lay a cunning plan, that
he may destroy this work; for he has
hath
put it into their hearts to do this, that by
lying they may say they have caught you in the words which
you have
pretended to translate.
-
"Verily I say unto you, that I will not
suffer that Satan shall accomplish his evil design in this
thing, for behold he has put it into their hearts
to get thee
to tempt the Lord their
thy
God, in asking to
translate it over again; for
And then,
behold they say
and think in their hearts, We will see if God
has given him power to translate, if so, he will also give
him power again; and if God giveth him power again, or if he
translate
translates again, or in other words, if
he bringeth forth the same words, behold we have the same
with us, and we have altered them: Therefore, they will not
agree, and we will say that he has lied in his words, and
that he has no gift, and that he has no power: therefore, we
will destroy him, and also the work, and we will do this
that we may not be ashamed in the end, and that we may get
glory of the world.
-
"Verily, verily I say unto you, that Satan
has great hold upon their hearts; he stirreth them up to
do
iniquity against that which is good,
And their hearts
are corrupt, and full of wickedness and abominations; and
they love darkness rather than light, because their deeds
are evil; therefore they will not ask of me. Satan stirreth
them up, that he may lead their souls to
destruction, and thus he has laid a cunning plan,
thinking
to destroy the work of God;
but I will
require this at their hands, and it shall turn to their
shame and condemnation in the day of judgment.
yea, he stirreth up their hearts to anger against the
this
work; yea, he saith unto them, Deceive and lie in wait to
catch, that ye may destroy: behold this is no harm, and thus
he flattereth them and telleth them that it is no sin to
lie, that they may catch a man in a lie, that they may
destroy him, and thus he flattereth them, and leadeth them
along until he draggeth their souls down to hell; and thus
he causeth them to catch themselves in their own snare; and
thus he goeth up and down, to and fro in the earth, seeking
to destroy the souls of men.
-
"Verily, verily I say unto you, wo be unto
him that lieth to deceive, because he supposeth that another
lieth to deceive, for such are not exempt from the justice
of God. Now, behold they have altered those
these
words, because Satan saith unto them, He hath deceived you,
and thus he flattereth them away to do iniquity,
to get thee
to tempt the Lord their
thy
God.
-
"Behold I say unto you, that you shall not
translate again those words which have gone forth out of
your hands; for behold, they shall not lie any more
accomplish their
evil designs in lying against those words;
for behold, if you should bring forth the same words, they
would
will say that you have lied;
and
that you have pretended to translate, but that you have
contradicted your words
yourself;
and behold they would
will
publish this, and Satan would
will
harden the hearts of the people, to stir them up to anger
against you, that they might
will
not believe my words: thus Satan would
thinketh to
overpower your
testimony in this generation, that the work
might
may not come forth in this generation: but
behold here is wisdom, and because I show unto you wisdom,
and give you commandments concerning these things, what you
shall do, show it not unto the world until you have
accomplished the work
of translation." (Book of
Commandments 9:1-7 and Doctrine and Covenants
10:1-34. Unfortunately, the Book of Commandments
appears to only be found on anti-LDS websites. The following
site appears to be the most innocuous, at least in
presenting the book:
http://www.2think.org/hundredsheep/boc/boc_main.shtml)
|
Questions:
Again, the above passage purports to contain a direct revelation from
God, and discusses the loss of 116 pages of the first
translation Joseph Smith attempted. God appears to be
telling Joseph Smith that they cannot re-translate and
re-publish these same 116 pages because, in essence, those who
captured those pages would alter the original and cast doubt
upon God and his work.
Yet, if God is so particular about having his
words altered, why do some of these revisions significantly alter this
very revelation?
In other words, why would God be so concerned about how his
enemies would alter his words, and how that might look to the
world, when his servants were also altering his words?
|
The second example is Book of
Commandments, Section 4:5-6, wherein God purportedly
stated the following:
-
"And thus, if the people of this generation
harden not their hearts, I will work a reformation among
them, and I will put down all lyings, and deceivings, and
priestcrafts, and envyings, and strifes, and idolatries, and
sorceries, and all manner of iniquities, and I will
establish my church, like unto the church which was taught
by my disciples in the days of old.
-
"And now if this generation do harden their
hearts against my word, behold, I will deliver them up unto
Satan, for he reigneth and hath much power at this time, for
he hath got great hold upon the hearts of the people of this
generation; and not far from the iniquities of Sodom and
Gomorrah, do they come at this time; and behold the sword of
justice hangeth over their heads, and if they persist in the
hardness of their hearts, the time cometh that it must fall
upon them...."
These verses were permanently removed in the
1835 Doctrine and Covenants without any clear
explanation.
|
Questions:
Is it reasonable to believe that God, without any explanation,
would take such a warning out of his word, which had already
been shared with the world? Would not such significant
deletions and alterations illicit confusion and even charges
of fraud and tampering from those seeking consistency and
truth?
|
Back to Index
Regarding Multiple Wives
The Book of Mormon states:
-
"For behold, thus saith the Lord: This people
begin to wax in iniquity; they understand not the
scriptures, for they seek to excuse themselves in committing
whoredoms, because of the things which were written
concerning David, and Solomon his son. Behold, David and
Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was
abominable before me, saith the Lord. Wherefore, thus
saith the Lord, I have led this people forth out of the land
of Jerusalem, by the power of mine arm, that I might raise
up unto me a righteous branch from the fruit of the loins of
Joseph. Wherefore, I the Lord God will not suffer that this
people shall do like unto them of old. Wherefore, my
brethren, hear me, and hearken to the word of the Lord: For
there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife;
and concubines he shall have none; For I, the Lord God,
delight in the chastity of women. And whoredoms are an
abomination before me; thus saith the Lord of Hosts.
Wherefore, this people shall keep my commandments, saith the
Lord of Hosts, or cursed be the land for their sakes. For if
I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me, I
will command my people; otherwise they shall hearken unto
these things. For behold, I, the Lord, have seen the
sorrow, and heard the mourning of the daughters of my people
in the land of Jerusalem, yea, and in all the lands of my
people, because of the wickedness and abominations of their
husbands. And I will not suffer, saith the Lord of Hosts,
that the cries of the fair daughters of this people, which I
have led out of the land of Jerusalem, shall come up unto me
against the men of my people, saith the Lord of Hosts. For
they shall not lead away captive the daughters of my people
because of their tenderness, save I shall visit them with a
sore curse, even unto destruction; for they shall not commit
whoredoms, like unto them of old, saith the Lord of Hosts."
(Jacob
2:22-33, bold added)
Joseph Smith introduced the doctrine of
polygamy as follows:
-
"Verily, thus saith the Lord unto you my
servant Joseph, that inasmuch as you have inquired of my
hand to know and understand wherein I, the Lord, justified
my servants Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as also Moses,
David and Solomon, my servants, as touching the principle
and doctrine of their having many wives and concubines...
David also received many wives and concubines, and also
Solomon and Moses my servants, as also many
others of my servants, from the beginning of creation until
this time; and in nothing did they sin save in those things
which they received not of me... David's wives and
concubines were given unto him of me, by the hand of
Nathan, my servant, and others of the prophets who had the
keys of this power; and in none of these things did he
sin against me save in the case of Uriah and his wife;
and, therefore he hath fallen from his exaltation, and
received his portion; and he shall not inherit them out of
the world, for I gave them unto another, saith the Lord."
(Doctrine and Covenants
132:1,38-39, bold added)
|
Questions:
Were David and Solomon abominable for taking multiple wives as
the Book of Mormon appears to state, or were they given
multiple wives by God as the Doctrine and Covenants appears to
state?
One hypothetical justification for this
apparent discrepancy is that, when the Lord told Jacob:
"Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and
concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the
Lord," he was only referring to the wives the Lord did not
give David and Solomon (including perhaps the
case of Uriah, where David committed adultery and murder).
But is it reasonable to assume that God is such
a poor communicator that he would overlook such details and
potential confusion when teaching such a core doctrine?
Again, as mentioned previously, God purportedly went to great
lengths to avoid potential issues regarding the transcribed
pages Joseph Smith lost.
|
To continue, the header for Doctrine and
Covenants,
Section 132, states:
-
"... Although the revelation was recorded in
1843, it is evident from the historical records that the
doctrines and principles involved in this revelation had
been known by the Prophet since 1831."
LDS President Joseph F. Smith also claimed
that:
-
"The great and glorious principle of plural
marriage was first revealed to Joseph Smith in 1831, but
being forbidden to make it public, or to teach it as a
doctrine of the Gospel, at that time, he confided the facts
to only a very few of his intimate associates." — Joseph F.
Smith, Deseret News, May 20, 1886
Yet, this admission appears to contradict a
purported revelation given in 1831 and published in the
aforementioned Book of Commandments in 1833:
-
"And again, I say unto you, that whoso
forbiddeth to marry, is not ordained of God, for marriage is
ordained of God unto man: Wherefore it is lawful that he
should have one wife, and they twain shall be one
flesh, and all this that the earth might answer the end of
its creation; and that it might be filled with the measure
of man, according to his creation before the world was
made." — Book of Commandments 52:16-17
|
Questions:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would indicate one wife
for every man when his servants were taking multiple wives?
Would he not be more clear so as to avoid confusion and claims
of illegitimacy?
|
Next, consider
verses 1-3 of Section 132:
-
"VERILY, thus saith the Lord unto you my
servant Joseph, that inasmuch as you have inquired of
my hand to know and understand wherein I, the Lord,
justified my servants Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as also
Moses, David and Solomon, my servants, as touching the
principle and doctrine of their having many wives and
concubines... Behold, and lo, I am the Lord thy God, and
will answer thee as touching this matter. Therefore, prepare
thy heart to receive and obey the instructions which I am
about to give unto you; for all those who have this law
revealed unto them must obey the same." [bold added]
Now examine
verses 51-52:
-
"Verily, I say unto you: A commandment I give
unto mine handmaid, Emma Smith, your wife, whom I have given
unto you, that she stay herself and partake not of that
which I commanded you to offer unto her; for I did it, saith
the Lord, to prove you all, as I did Abraham, and that I
might require an offering at your hand, by covenant and
sacrifice. And let mine handmaid, Emma Smith, receive all
those that have been given unto my servant Joseph, and
who are virtuous and pure before me; and those who are not
pure, and have said they were pure, shall be destroyed,
saith the Lord God." [bold added]
Joseph Smith apparently inquired to know God's
stand on polygamy after he had already taken other
wives. Yet, the Book of Mormon appears to assert that
no one is to take more than one wife unless the Lord first
commands them to do so:
-
"For if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts,
raise up seed unto me, I will command my people; otherwise
they shall hearken unto these things." (Jacob
2:30)
|
Question:
Why would God command his servant to seek permission to
practice plural marriage and then ignore the fact that
permission had not been sought prior to taking additional
wives?
Note: Also, early LDS
church leaders had many wives, and yet there was never a
command recorded, either in Doctrine and Covenants 132 or
elsewhere, to "raise up seed," as per the Book of Mormon's
purported purpose for this practice.
|
In addition,
Section 132 was not included in the Doctrine and
Covenants until 1876, and was not widely circulated until
long after Joseph Smith's death in 1844.
|
Question:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would hide Section 132
from the world, particularly when observers were wondering why
his servants were taking multiple wives without any
explanation? |
An "Article of Marriage" was added to the 1835
version of the Doctrine and Covenants, however. This article
was deleted in the same year that section 132 was added. Here
is part of that original "Article on Marriage":
-
"Inasmuch as this Church of Christ has been
reproached with the crime of fornication and polygamy, we
declare that we believe that one man should have one
wife, and one woman but one husband, except in
case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again."
[bold and underline added]
The word "but" appears to possibly be
significant as it appears in the case of the woman's partner(s),
but not in the case of the man's partner(s).
|
Questions:
Would God phrase such a document in this fashion if his
followers were indeed already taking more than one wife?
Would not those seeking consistency and truth be discouraged
to read a document such as this and thereafter learn that LDS
leaders were already taking multiple wives?
|
Other declarations are equally puzzling:
-
"Do the Mormons believe in having more
wives than one? No, not at the same time. But they
believe that if their companion dies, they have a right to
marry again. But we do disapprove of the custom, which has
gained in the world, and has been practiced among us, to our
great mortification, in marrying in five or six weeks, or
even in two or three months, after the death of their
companion. We believe that due respect ought to be had to
the memory of the dead, and the feelings of both friends and
children." — Joseph Smith, History of the Church,
vol. 3, p. 28, see also Elder's Journal, cited in
vol. I, no. II, pp 28-29, bold added).
Consider this public notice in the Times and
Seasons 5:3:423, apparently written after Doctrine and
Covenants
132
was given:
"TIMES AND SEASONS. CITY OF NAUVOO, THURSDAY,
FEBRUARY 1, 1844. NOTICE.
-
"As we have lately been credibly informed,
that an Elder of the Church of Jesus Christ, of Latter day
Saints, by the name of Hiram Brown, has been preaching
Polygamy, and other false and corrupt doctrines, in
the county of Lapeer, state of Michigan.
-
"This is to notify him and the Church in
general, that he has been cut off from the church, for his
iniquity; and he is further notified to appear at the
Special Conference, on the 6th of April next, to make answer
to these charges.
-
"JOSEPH SMITH,
HYRUM SMITH,
Presidents of said Church." [bold added]
Here are additional examples:
-
"CERTIFICATES OF WILLIAM AND HENRY MARKS.
Inasmuch as John C. Bennett has called upon me through the
Sangamo Journal to come out and confirm the statements which
he has made concerning Joseph Smith and others, I take this
opportunity of saying to the public, that I know many of his
statements to be false, and that I believe them all to be
the to be the offspring of a base and corrupt heart, and
without the least shadow of truth, and further that he has
used my name without my permission. I believe him to be a
vile and wicked adulterous man, who pays no regard to the
principles of truth or righteousness, and is unworthy the
confidence of a just community. I would further state
that I know of no Order in the Church which admits of a
plurality of wives, and do not believe that Joseph Smith
ever taught such a doctrine, and further, that my faith
in the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints, and in Joseph Smith, is unshaken." — William Marks,
given in Nauvoo on July 26, 1842, Times and Seasons,
3:19:875 [bold added]
-
"We are charged with advocating a
plurality of wives, and common property. Now this is as
false as the many other ridiculous charges which are brought
against us. No sect have a greater reverence for the
laws of matrimony, or the rights of private property, and we
do what others do not, practice what we preach..." (Times
and Seasons, 4:9:143, October 1, 1842, or pp. 939-940,
bold added)
-
"...[F]or the information of those who may
be assailed by those foolish tales about two wives, we would
say that no such principle ever existed among the Latter-day
Saints, and never will. This is well known to all who
are acquainted with our books and actions, the Book of
Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants; and also all our
periodicals are very strict on that subject, indeed far more
so than the Bible." (Millennial Star, vol. 111,
p. 74, bold added)
-
"What a thing it is for a man to be accused
of committing adultery, and having seven wives, when I can
only find one. I am the same man, and as innocent as I was
fourteen years ago; and I can prove them all perjurers." —
Joseph Smith, May 26, 1844, recorded in History of the
Church, vol. 6, p. 411
|
Questions:
Can it reasonably be argued that God is the author of such
contradictory messages? Does this not seem deceitful,
which appears to be condemned by the Old Testament?
"Cursed be he that doeth the work of the LORD
deceitfully..." (Jeremiah 48:10)
|
To add to these questions, when President
Gordon B. Hinckley was asked on Larry King Live about
polygamy, he responded:
-
"The figures I have are from between two
percent and five percent of our people were involved in it.
It was a very limited practice; carefully safeguarded. In
1890, that practice was discontinued. The president of the
church, the man who occupied the position which I occupy
today, went before the people, said he had, oh, prayed about
it, worked on it, and had received from the Lord a
revelation that it was time to stop, to discontinue it then.
That's 118 years ago. It's behind us... I condemn it, yes,
as a practice, because I think it is not doctrinal. It is
not legal. And this church takes the position that we will
abide by the law. We believe in being subject to kings,
presidents, rulers, magistrates in honoring, obeying and
sustaining the law." — President Gordon B. Hinckley, Larry
King Live radio program, September 8, 1998
|
Question:
Why would God's current prophet appear to philosophically and
universally denounce the practice? Couldn't he perhaps openly
declare that it was correctly introduced to raise up seed to
the Lord as per the Book of Mormon's apparent
directive, but was no longer required, and therefore the
practice was ended? Why would God's servants speak in such a
confusing fashion?
|
Back to Index
Regarding Spiritual Gifts
According to the Book of Commandments,
Section 4:2, the following apparent revelation from God was
given in March 1829:
-
"And he (Joseph) has a gift to translate the
Book and I have commanded him that he shall pretend to no
other gift, for I will grant him no other gift."
[bold added]
One year later, on April 6, 1830, Joseph Smith
presented the following purported revelation:
-
"BEHOLD, there shall be a record kept among
you; and in it thou [Joseph Smith] shalt be called
a seer, a translator, a prophet, an apostle of Jesus Christ,
an elder of the church through the will of God the Father,
and the grace of your Lord Jesus Christ, Being inspired of
the Holy Ghost to lay the foundation thereof, and to
build it up unto the most holy faith. Which church was
organized and established in the year of your Lord eighteen
hundred and thirty, in the fourth month, and on the sixth
day of the month which is called April. Wherefore, meaning
the church, thou shalt give heed unto all his words and
commandments which he shall give unto you as he receiveth
them, walking in all holiness before me; For his word ye
shall receive, as if from mine own mouth, in all patience
and faith. For by doing these things the gates of hell shall
not prevail against you; yea, and the Lord God will disperse
the powers of darkness from before you, and cause the
heavens to shake for your good, and his name's glory. For
thus saith the Lord God: Him have I inspired to move the
cause of Zion in mighty power for good, and his diligence I
know, and his prayers I have heard. Yea, his weeping for
Zion I have seen, and I will cause that he shall mourn for
her no longer; for his days of rejoicing are come unto the
remission of his sins, and the manifestations of my
blessings upon his works. For, behold, I will bless all
those who labor in my vineyard with a mighty blessing, and
they shall believe on his words, which are given him through
me by the Comforter, which manifesteth that Jesus was
crucified by sinful men for the sins of the world, yea, for
the remission of sins unto the contrite heart." (Doctrine
and Covenants
21:1-9, bold added).
|
Questions:
Are the callings of a seer, a translator, a prophet, an
apostle of Jesus Christ, an elder of the church, and the
founder of God's church additional gifts? If so, is not
this inconsistent with the previous apparent revelation?
|
In the first edition of the Doctrine and
Covenants, Section 5:4 in 1835, the aforementioned passage
from the Book of Commandments was altered to read (the words
in red bold
underline were added and the words in
bold strikethrough were deleted):
-
"And he has
you have a gift to
translate the Book
plates; and this
is the first gift that I bestowed upon you;
and I have commanded him that
he you
shall
should pretend to no other gift,
until my purpose is fulfilled in
this; for I will grant unto him
you no other gift
until it is finished." (This wording is the
same in the current edition of the
Doctrine and Covenants 5:4)
|
Questions:
Is it consistent to believe that: 1) God would provide such
apparently contradictory revelations and allow them to be
publicly disseminated to the world, and, (2) that God's
authorized servant would only correct the first revelation
after he had assumed additional gifts? According the King
Benjamin of the Book of Mormon:
-
"...He never doth vary from that which he
hath said; therefore, if ye do keep his commandments he doth
bless and prosper you." (Mosiah
2:22)
Is it reasonable to assume that, with regard to
the question of legitimacy and who ultimately holds power over
God's church, God would allow his authorized servants to
portray him in such a fashion? It should be noted that
these alterations are attributed to the same God that refused
to allow Joseph Smith to re-translate the pages he lost
because, again according to the official LDS record, God's
enemies would attempt to change his word and discredit his
entire work in this age of mankind. |
Back to Index
Regarding the Book of Mormon
A revelation purportedly given to Joseph Smith,
Oliver Cowdery, and David Whitmer in Fayette, New York, June
1829, in the Book of Commandments, Chapter 15, reads:
-
"Behold I give unto you a commandment,
that you rely upon the things which are written; for in them
are all things written, concerning my church, my
gospel, and my rock. Wherefore if you shall build up my
church, and my gospel, and my rock, the gates of hell shall
not prevail against you." [bold and underline added]
God appears to be stating that the things that
were written up to that time — June 1829 — contained all that
was necessary to build God's Church and proclaim his gospel to
mankind.
In the Doctrine and Covenants,
Section 16, however, this scripture has been altered to
read the following (the words in
red bold underline were added and the words in
bold strikethrough were deleted):
-
"Behold I give unto you a commandment, that
you rely upon the things which are written; for in them are
all things written, concerning
the foundation of my church, my gospel, and
my rock.
Wherefore ;
wherefore, if you shall build up my church,
and
upon the foundation of
my gospel, and my rock, the gates of
hell shall not prevail against you."
|
Question:
Is it reasonable to conclude that both of these revelations
are consistent and authored by the same God?
|
Let us look in the Book of Mormon again
to attempt to clarify this question. Jesus Christ [i.e. "the
Lamb"] purportedly tells the prophet Nephi:
-
"For, behold, saith the Lamb: I will manifest
myself unto thy seed, that they shall write many things
which I shall minister unto them, which shall be plain and
precious; and after thy seed shall be destroyed, and dwindle
in unbelief, and also the seed of thy brethren, behold,
these things shall be hid up, to come forth unto the
Gentiles, by the gift and power of the Lamb. And in them
shall be written my gospel, saith the Lamb, and my rock and
my salvation. (1
Nephi 13:35-36)
The Book of Mormon is apparently to come forth from the seed
of the Nephites, and it is supposed to contain God's gospel
and rock just as the aforementioned Book of Commandments
originally stated. Speaking again of the Book of Mormon,
God purportedly said:
-
"For thus it behooveth the Father that it
should come forth from the Gentiles, that he may show forth
his power unto the Gentiles, for this cause that the
Gentiles, if they will not harden their hearts, that they
may repent and come unto me and be baptized in my name
and know of the true points of my doctrine, that
they may be numbered among my people, O house of Israel." (3
Nephi 21:6, bold and underline added)
|
Questions:
The wording states "the true points of my doctrine,"
not "some" or "many" true points of God's doctrine. Why then
are the numerous books and other publications produced after
June 1829 considered scriptural or canonical by the LDS
Church, such as the Doctrine and Covenants, the Ensign,
the Pearl of Great Price, etc.? None of these are the
sealed records of Lehi's seed and none are alleged to be
written by Lehi's seed. These additional works contain
numerous references to doctrines that are apparently core to
the salvation of mankind and seem not to be discussed — even
remotely — in the Book of Mormon (examples: polygamy
and temple work for the living and deceased). Is it reasonable
to assume that God is the author of this apparent confusion or
lack of clarity?
|
Back to Index
Regarding the Name of the Church
According to the Book of Mormon, Jesus
Christ revealed the name of his church to the Nephite people:
the "church of Christ".
-
"And they who were baptized in the name of
Jesus were called the church of Christ." (3
Nephi 26:21, bold added)
-
"And they said unto him: Lord, we will
that thou wouldst tell us the name whereby we shall call
this church; for there are disputations among the people
concerning this matter. And the Lord said unto them:
Verily, verily, I say unto you, why is it that the people
should murmur and dispute because of this thing? Have they
not read the scriptures, which say ye must take upon you the
name of Christ, which is my name? For by this name shall ye
be called at the last day; And whoso taketh upon him my
name, and endureth to the end, the same shall be saved at
the last day. Therefore, whatsoever ye shall do, ye shall do
it in my name; therefore ye shall call the church in my
name; and ye shall call upon the Father in my name that
he will bless the church for my sake. And how be it my
church save it be called in my name? For if a church be
called in Moses' name then it be Moses' church; or if it be
called in the name of a man then it be the church of a man;
but if it be called in my name then it is my church, if it
so be that they are built upon my gospel. Verily I say unto
you, that ye are built upon my gospel; therefore ye shall
call whatsoever things ye do call, in my name; therefore if
ye call upon the Father, for the church, if it be in my name
the Father will hear you; And if it so be that the church is
built upon my gospel then will the Father show forth his own
works in it. But if it be not built upon my gospel, and is
built upon the works of men, or upon the works of the devil,
verily I say unto you they have joy in their works for a
season, and by and by the end cometh, and they are hewn down
and cast into the fire, from whence there is no return." (3
Nephi 27:3-11, bold added)
On April 6, 1830, LDS church leaders met
together presumably to fulfill the requirements of the laws of
the land, and they named their church consistent with the
admonition of the Book of Mormon, "The Church of
Christ."
On May 3, 1834, Joseph Smith, as moderator,
made a motion to change the name of the church to, "The Church
of the Latter Day Saints," which was adopted by unanimous vote
(The Evening and Morning Star, vol. 2, no. 20, p. 160,
May 1834; History of the Church 2:62).
Four years later, on April 26, 1838, it was
again changed to "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints" and has remained thus since.
|
Questions:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would periodically change
the name of his church? If Jesus Christ is the central
character of God's religion on earth and all things are to be
done in his name, is it reasonable to assume that God would
instruct his church leaders to entirely leave out the name of
Christ from the period of May 3, 1834 to April 26, 1838?
|
Back to Index
Regarding Objective LDS History
Apostle and
Elder Boyd K. Packer, at the Fifth Annual Church
Educational System Religious Educators' Symposium at Brigham
Young University in August 1981, stated:
-
"I have come to believe that it is the
tendency for many members of the Church who spend a great
deal of time in academic research to begin to judge the
Church, its doctrine, organization, and leadership, present
and past, by the principles of their own profession.
Oft-times this is done unwittingly, and some of it, perhaps,
is not harmful...
-
"You seminary teachers and some of you
institute and BYU men will be teaching the history of the
Church this school year. This is an unparalleled opportunity
in the lives of your students to increase their faith and
testimony of the divinity of this work. Your objective
should be that they will see the hand of the Lord in every
hour and every moment of the Church from its beginning till
now...
-
"Church history can be so interesting and so
inspiring as to be a very powerful tool indeed for building
faith. If not properly written or properly taught, it may be
a faith destroyer...
-
"There is a temptation for the writer or the
teacher of Church history to want to tell everything,
whether it is worthy or faith promoting or not...
-
"Some things that are true are not very
useful...
-
"That historian or scholar who delights in
pointing out the weaknesses and frailties of present or past
leaders destroys faith. A destroyer of faith — particularly
one within the Church, and more particularly one who is
employed specifically to build faith — places himself in
great spiritual jeopardy. He is serving the wrong master,
and unless he repents, he will not be among the faithful in
the eternities...
-
"The final caution concerns the idea that so
long as something is already in print, so long as it is
available from another source, there is nothing out of order
in using it in writing or speaking, or teaching. Surely you
can see the fallacy in that. I have on occasion been
disappointed when I have read statements that tend to
belittle or degrade the Church or past leaders of the Church
in writings of those who are supposed to be worthy members
of the Church. When I have commented on my disappointment to
see that in print, the answer has been. 'It was printed
before, and it's available, and therefore I saw no reason
not to publish it again.'
-
"You do not do well to see that it is
disseminated. It may be read by those not mature enough for
'advanced history,' and a testimony in seedling stage may be
crushed... Do not spread disease germs." — Elder Boyd K.
Packer, "The Mantle is Far, Far Greater Than the Intellect,"
available through BYU Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 262
|
Questions:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would take such an
attitude with regard to the history of his single, true
organization on the earth? Would not God be prepared to
conduct all historical debates in the open and to
satisfactorily confront any apparent doctrinal or behavioral
inconsistencies perpetrated by imperfect mortals?
|
Many historical documents are available only
through those who openly profess to be antagonistic to the LDS
church. The website at
http://www.2think.org/hundredsheep/boc/boc_main.shtml, for
example, contains the 1833 Book of Commandments. The
website
http://www.concordance.com/mormon.htm, as another
example, has a search engine for early publications such as
History of the Church, Journal of Discourses,
Times and Seasons, Evening and Morning Star, and
Elder's Journal. The website at
http://www.xmission.com/~country/reason/pub1.htm
contains several documents, including interviews and letters
from David Whitmer, William McLellin, and William Law, the
actual text of the Nauvoo Expositor, speeches by Brigham
Young, and what remains of the end of the John Whitmer
journals.(see
http://www.2think.org/hundredsheep/boc/boc_main.shtml)
|
Question:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would leave it to
individuals and organizations antagonistic to his church to
discuss these types of issues and historical events?
|
Back to Index
PART II: Questions of Loyalty & Trust
Regarding Loyalty to Mortals
According to the Book of Mormon, the
prophet Alma stated:
-
"Ye shall not esteem one flesh above another,
or one man shall not think himself above another... Even so
I desire that ye should stand fast in the liberty wherewith
ye have been made free, and that ye trust no man to be a
king over you. And also trust no one to be your
teacher nor your minister, except he be a man of God,
walking in his ways and keeping his commandments." (Mosiah
23:7,13-14, bold added)
The prophet Nephi from the Book of Mormon
stated the following:
-
"O Lord, I have trusted in thee and I will
trust in thee forever. I will not put my trust in the arm of
flesh; for I know that cursed is he that putteth his trust
in the arm of flesh. Yea, cursed is he that putteth his
trust in man or maketh flesh his arm." (2
Nephi 4:34)
-
"He commandeth that there shall be no
priestcrafts; for, behold, priestcrafts are that men preach
and set themselves up for a light unto the world, that they
may get gain and praise of the world; but they seek not the
welfare of Zion. Behold, the Lord hath forbidden this
thing..." (2
Nephi 26:29-30)
-
"They wear stiff necks and high heads; yea,
and because of pride and wickedness, and abominations, and
whoredoms, they have all gone astray save it be a few, who
are the humble followers of Christ; nevertheless, they
are led that in many instances they do err because they
are taught by the precepts of men." (2
Nephi 28:14)
-
"Cursed is he that putteth his trust in
man, or maketh flesh his arm, or shall hearken unto the
precepts of men, save their precepts shall be given by the
power of the Holy Ghost. Wo unto the Gentiles, saith the
Lord of Hosts! For notwithstanding I shall lengthen mine arm
unto them from day to day, they will deny me..." (2
Nephi 28:31-32, bold added)
The Biblical prophet Isaiah is quoted in
2 Nephi 13:12:
-
"And my people, children are their
oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they who
lead thee cause thee to err and destroy the ways of thy
paths."
-
"For the leaders of this people cause them to
err; and they that are led of them are destroyed." (2
Nephi 19:16)
From the New Testament scripture that
purportedly had great influence on Joseph Smith to scrutinize
the religions of his day:
-
"If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of
God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not;
and it shall be given him." (James
1:5, bold added)
-
And from Corinthians in the New Testament:
-
"Ye are bought with a price; be ye not
therefore the servants of men." (1
Corinthians 7:23, bold added)
Compare these passages with statements by
modern LDS prophets. For instance, the LDS
12th Article of Faith, purportedly written by Joseph Smith
(and contained alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and
Coventants, Pearl of Great Price, and Bible in their canonized
scriptures) states:
"We believe in being subject to kings,
presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring,
and sustaining the law."
|
Question:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would instruct his people,
the Nephites, to "trust no man to be a king over you,"
instruct modern men and women to follow the Nephite teachings,
and simultaneously expect us all to "be subject to kings"?
Note: To examine how Mormon leaders apply this
doctrine of subjection in the past and present, see a related
article, under Topic 4, "Mormon
Leaders Schmooze East German Dictator," as well as the
article's "Appendix
2: Mormon Territorial Legislature Enacts Slavery".
|
Wilford Woodruff, the third President of the
LDS Church, also stated:
-
"The Lord will never permit me or any other
man who stands as President of this Church to lead you
astray. It is not in the programme. It is not in the mind of
God. If I were to attempt that, the Lord would remove me out
of my place, and so He will any other man who attempts to
lead the children of men astray from the oracles of God and
from their duty." (Excerpts from Three Addresses by
President Wilford Woodruff Regarding the Manifesto,
Doctrine and Covenants, under
Declaration 1)
The April 2002 LDS General Conference provides
another example:
-
"One of the sneaky ploys of the adversary is
to have us believe that unquestioning obedience to the
principles and commandments of God is blind obedience. His
goal is to have us believe that we should be following our
own worldly ways and selfish ambitions. This he does by
persuading us that 'blindly' following the prophets and
obeying the commandments is not thinking for ourselves. He
teaches that it is not intelligent to do something just
because we are told to do so by a living prophet or by
prophets who speak to us from the scriptures.
-
"Our unquestioning obedience to the Lord's
commandments is not blind obedience. President Boyd K.
Packer in the April conference of 1983 taught us about this:
'Latter-day Saints are not obedient because they are
compelled to be obedient. They are obedient because they
know certain spiritual truths and have decided, as an
expression of their own individual agency, to obey the
commandments of God. . . . We are not obedient because we
are blind, we are obedient because we can see' — Elder Boyd
K. Packer, "Agency
and Control," Ensign, May 1983, 66).
-
"We might call this 'faith obedience.' With
faith, Abraham was obedient in preparing Isaac for
sacrifice; with faith, Nephi was obedient in obtaining the
brass plates; with faith, a little child obediently jumps
from a height into the strong arms of his father. "Faith
obedience" is a matter of trust. The question is simple: Do
we trust our Heavenly Father? Do we trust our prophets?" —
Elder R. Conrad Schultz, "Faith
Obedience," April 2002 General Conference Report,
Ensign)
From President Ezra Taft Benson:
-
"President Marion G. Romney tells of this
incident, which happened to him: I remember years ago when I
was a Bishop I had President [Heber J.] Grant talk to our
ward. After the meeting I drove him home....Standing by me,
he put his arm over my shoulder and said: 'My boy, you
always keep your eye on the President of the Church, and if
he ever tells you to do anything, and it is wrong, and you
do it, the Lord will bless you for it.' Then with a
twinkle in his eye, he said, 'But you don't need to worry.
The Lord will never let his mouthpiece lead the people
astray.'" — Elder Ezra Taft Benson Fourteen, "Fundamentals
in Following a Prophet," given at the Marrriott Center at
Brigham Young University, February 6, 1980; see also Ensign
Conference Report, October 1960, p. 78 [bold added]
From the LDS-owned and -operated Deseret
News newspaper and Improvement Era magazine:
-
"Any Latter-day Saint who denounces or
opposes whether actively or otherwise, any plan or doctrine
advocated by the prophets, seers, revelators' of the church,
is cultivating the spirit of apostasy. One cannot speak evil
of the lord's anointed... and retain the holy spirit in his
heart. This sort of game is Satan's favorite pastime, and he
has practiced it to believing souls since Adam. He [Satan]
wins a great victory when he can get members of the church
to speak against their leaders and to do their own thinking.
-
"When our leaders speak, the thinking has
been done. When they propose a plan — it is God's Plan. When
they point the way, there is no other which is safe. When
they give directions, it should mark the end of controversy,
God works in no other way. To think otherwise, without
immediate repentance, may cost one his faith, may destroy
his testimony, and leave him a stranger to the kingdom of
God." (Ward Teachers Message, Deseret News, Church
Section p. 5, May 26, 1945; also included in the
Improvement Era, June 1945)
From Heber C. Kimball:
-
"In regard to our situation and circumstances
in these valleys, brethren WAKE UP! WAKE UP, YE ELDERS OF
ISRAEL, AND LIVE TO GOD and none else; and learn to do as
you are told, both old and young: learn to do as you are
told for the future, And when you are taking a position, if
you do not know that you are right, do not take it [—] I mean
independently. But if you are told by your leader to do a
thing, do it. None of your business whether it is right or
wrong... you and I want to live our religion and do as we
are told, not questioning a word for a moment. You have got
to stop that. It is enough for others to do that, without
our meddling with those things. I am speaking to the Elders
of Israel." — Heber C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses,
vol. 3, pp. 32-33
Finally, LDS members who receive their temple
endowment ceremony make a solemn covenant to avoid "evil
speaking of the Lord's anointed," i.e. the LDS leaders.
|
Questions:
How can the LDS-endorsed scriptures previously cited be
consistent with any of these statements by LDS leaders? Is not
the implied and reinforced message that a member who speaks
negatively about modern LDS leaders has engaged in "evil
speaking" — regardless of whether the statements are true?
Is it reasonable to assume that God would supply and endorse
such seemingly contradictory messages?
I must add my subjective experience as a
freedom advocate in Utah to illustrate additional questions I
was forced to consider. I have publicly taken the LDS church
to task for some of the political activities of its direct
corporate subsidiaries (such as the Deseret News and
various Utah radio stations). Regardless of whether my
scrutiny is accurate, I have been considered heretical and
evil for merely stating what I perceive and have personally
witnessed.
If one risks eternal damnation by merely
questioning or scrutinizing the words or actions of other
mortals, how can one determine whether the course one is
following is the correct course? Is it reasonable to conclude
that God would command us to question the actions of some
organizations, but not the very organization and servants he
holds up as "the light of the world" (Matthew
5:14, New Testament)? Does it seem consistent and just to
believe that some mortals are more equal than other mortals —
in that they are inherently less subject to public (and
private) scrutiny?
For more discussion on the Judeo-Christian
origins of the doctrine of loyalty to men in certain positions
of power, see "The
'Refined Racism' of a 'Chosen People'".
|
Back to Index
Regarding Loyalty to an Organization
Current LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley
stated:
-
"The strength of this cause and kingdom is
not found in its temporal assets, impressive as they may be.
Faith underlies loyalty to the Church." ("The
Miracle of Faith," Ensign, May 2001, bold added)
-
"Now, brothers and sisters, let us go forth
from this conference with a stronger resolve to live the
gospel, to be more faithful, to be better fathers and
mothers and sons and daughters, to be absolutely loyal to
one another as families, and absolutely loyal to the Church
as members." ("Good-bye
for Another Season," Ensign, May 2001, bold
added)
|
Questions:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would require mortals to
exercise faith and loyalty in an inanimate object: an
organization? Are not organizations mere groupings of
individuals that comprise them? This personification is
confusing. Does this mean that individuals are to have
faith and loyalty in the leaders of organization? If so,
then the previous questions regarding loyalty to mortals may
also be asked here.
|
Back to Index
PART III: Questions of Authority
Regarding Melchizedek/Aaronic Priesthoods
Several details surrounding Joseph Smith's
purported reception of authority — be it Melchizedek, Aaronic,
or otherwise — are unclear based upon historical LDS records.
First, the exact date of the reception of the supposed
Melchizedek Priesthood is not known. Second, accounts of
the reception and bestowal of this higher priesthood are
confusing. According to the Doctrine and Covenants:
-
"And also with Peter, and James, and John,
whom I have sent unto you [note: this apparently refers
to the Melchizedek Priesthood, as John the Baptist
purportedly came alone to confer the Aaronic Priesthood on
Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery], by whom I have ordained
you and confirmed you [i.e. Joseph Smith and Oliver
Cowdery] to be apostles, and especial witnesses of my name,
and bear the keys of your ministry and of the same things
which I revealed unto them; Unto whom I have
committed the keys of my kingdom, and a dispensation of the
gospel for the last times; and for the fulness of times, in
the which I will gather together in one all things, both
which are in heaven, and which are on earth; And also with
all those whom my Father hath given me out of the world.
Wherefore, lift up your hearts and rejoice, and gird up your
loins, and take upon you my whole armor, that ye may be able
to withstand the evil day, having done all, that ye may be
able to stand. Stand, therefore, having your loins girt
about with truth, having on the breastplate of
righteousness, and your feet shod with the preparation of
the gospel of peace, which I have sent mine angels to commit
unto you..." (Doctrine and Covenants
27:12-16, bold added and notes added in brackets)
Oliver Cowdery, who claimed to be present when
Joseph Smith received the Melchizedek Priesthood, wrote of one
angel rather than three angels:
-
"I was present with Joseph when an holy angel
[note: purportedly John the Baptist] from God came down from
heaven and conferred on us, or restored, the lesser or
Aaronic Priesthood, and said to us, at the same time, that
it should remain upon the earth while the earth stands. I
was also present with Joseph when the higher or Melchizedek
Priesthood was conferred by the holy angel from on
high. This Priesthood, we then conferred on each other by
the will and commandment of God." (History of the Church,
vol. 1, p. 40 footnote, bold added and note added in
brackets)
|
Questions:
Is it reasonable to conclude that God would allow the exact
date of the restoration of the most important power on earth
to be forgotten and not recorded? Is it reasonable to
accept that God would permit the only two witnesses of such an
historic event to appear to contradict one another on the
matter of the number | |